Piping Rahadianto


English used for every reason at university for example English collaborated with business that must be more important in daily uses as the English for specific things or purposes. All we know it as English for Specific Purposes or ESP. Such as in the development of teaching and learning English especially English in university or in ESP we need a media or book in their procedure and its implementation. And for its procedures every materials or book are needs to be appropriates in their materials with the education aspect such as the philosophical aspects on its. On addition philosophical aspect is the main aspect on it that can be a hence to elaborates the material for the student need especially for ESP student. This research objective is to explain the appropriateness of the philosophical aspects by the Hopkin theory in book entitled “Business Basic I” for ESP Student in terms of its contents. The design of this study is descriptive qualitative, and it is taken from documents and material resumed in its book. This research is categorized as qualitative research design because this study is aimed to identify the book toward the criteria of good book and its content. Based on the result and analysis of the research that have been done, the writer can conclude that a book with the title “Business Basic I” was categories in an appropriate and a good book related to the description of the material. And for the interpretation toward the philosophical foundation aspects that consist six aspects such as Clarity, Consistency with the fact, Consistency with Experience, Consistency with other Beliefs, Utility and Simplicity it can be shown that this book run and construct by social reconstruction philosophy and structuralism philosophy. It can be shown from the several philosophical foundation aspects from the data collection result

Full Text:



Anderson, B. (2007). Pedagogical Rules and Their Relationship to Frequency in Input: Observational and Empirical Data from French, Applied Linguistics 28 (2)

Bazerman, C. (2002). Rhetorical research for reflective practice: A multi-layered narrative. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 79–93). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.

Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Professional discourse: Towards a multi-dimensional approach and shared practice. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 39–60). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research of Education: An Introductive to Theories and Methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Diane D. Belcher. (2004). Trends In Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (2004) 24, 165B186. Printed in the USA. Cambridge University Press.

Gill, S. K. (2002a). International Communication: English Language Challenges for Malaysia. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Gill, S. K. (2002b). Language policy and English language standards in Malaysia: Nationalism versus pragmatism. Journal of Asia-Pacific Communication, 12(1), 95-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/japc. 12.1.07gil

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17–29.

Jantmary Thirusanku & Melor Md Yunus, (2014). Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science; Vol. 10, No. 14; 2014. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53–79). London: Routledge.

Merrifield, J. (1998). Contested ground: Performance accountability in adult basic education. NCSALL Briefs—Report #1.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004).Curriculum foundation, principles and issues. Boston: Pearson.

Paltridge, B. (2002). Genre, text type, and the English for academic purposes (EAP) classroom. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 73–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sugiyono. (2013). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Swales, J. (2002). On models in applied discourse analysis. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 61–77). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.

Swales, J., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 105–119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Swales, J., & Luebs, M. (2002). Genre analysis and the advanced second language writer. In E. Barton & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 135–154). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Watanabe, Norris, and Gonzalez-Lloret (2009). Identifying and responding to evaluation needs in College foreign language programs. In J. M. Norris, J. McE. Davis, C. Sinicrope, & Y. Watanabe (Eds.), towards useful program evaluation in college foreign language education. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.


  • There are currently no refbacks.